标签云
asm恢复 bbed bootstrap$ dul In Memory kcbzib_kcrsds_1 kccpb_sanity_check_2 kfed MySQL恢复 ORA-00312 ORA-00607 ORA-00704 ORA-01110 ORA-01555 ORA-01578 ORA-08103 ORA-600 2131 ORA-600 2662 ORA-600 2663 ORA-600 3020 ORA-600 4000 ORA-600 4137 ORA-600 4193 ORA-600 4194 ORA-600 16703 ORA-600 kcbzib_kcrsds_1 ORA-600 KCLCHKBLK_4 ORA-15042 ORA-15196 ORACLE 12C oracle dul ORACLE PATCH Oracle Recovery Tools oracle加密恢复 oracle勒索 oracle勒索恢复 oracle异常恢复 Oracle 恢复 ORACLE恢复 ORACLE数据库恢复 oracle 比特币 OSD-04016 YOUR FILES ARE ENCRYPTED 勒索恢复 比特币加密文章分类
- Others (2)
- 中间件 (2)
- WebLogic (2)
- 操作系统 (102)
- 数据库 (1,671)
- DB2 (22)
- MySQL (73)
- Oracle (1,533)
- Data Guard (52)
- EXADATA (8)
- GoldenGate (21)
- ORA-xxxxx (159)
- ORACLE 12C (72)
- ORACLE 18C (6)
- ORACLE 19C (14)
- ORACLE 21C (3)
- Oracle 23ai (7)
- Oracle ASM (65)
- Oracle Bug (8)
- Oracle RAC (52)
- Oracle 安全 (6)
- Oracle 开发 (28)
- Oracle 监听 (28)
- Oracle备份恢复 (560)
- Oracle安装升级 (92)
- Oracle性能优化 (62)
- 专题索引 (5)
- 勒索恢复 (78)
- PostgreSQL (18)
- PostgreSQL恢复 (6)
- SQL Server (27)
- SQL Server恢复 (8)
- TimesTen (7)
- 达梦数据库 (2)
- 生活娱乐 (2)
- 至理名言 (11)
- 虚拟化 (2)
- VMware (2)
- 软件开发 (37)
- Asp.Net (9)
- JavaScript (12)
- PHP (2)
- 小工具 (20)
-
最近发表
- Kylin Linux 安装19c
- ORA-600 krse_arc_complete.4
- Oracle 19c 202410补丁(RUs+OJVM)
- ntfs MFT损坏(ntfs文件系统故障)导致oracle异常恢复
- .mkp扩展名oracle数据文件加密恢复
- 清空redo,导致ORA-27048: skgfifi: file header information is invalid
- A_H_README_TO_RECOVER勒索恢复
- 通过alert日志分析客户自行对一个数据库恢复的来龙去脉和点评
- ORA-12514: TNS: 监听进程不能解析在连接描述符中给出的SERVICE_NAME
- ORA-01092 ORA-00604 ORA-01558故障处理
- ORA-65088: database open should be retried
- Oracle 19c异常恢复—ORA-01209/ORA-65088
- ORA-600 16703故障再现
- 数据库启动报ORA-27102 OSD-00026 O/S-Error: (OS 1455)
- .[metro777@cock.li].Elbie勒索病毒加密数据库恢复
- 应用连接错误,初始化mysql数据库恢复
- RAC默认服务配置优先节点
- Oracle 19c RAC 替换私网操作
- 监听报TNS-12541 TNS-12560 TNS-00511错误
- drop tablespace xxx including contents恢复
分类目录归档:Oracle Bug
回收站中有大量wri$_rcs表
在对一套Oracle 12.1.0.2的数据库巡检之时发现大量WRI$_RCS_数字_1的表在回收站中,从命名中看该表应该是Oracle某个自动任务处理后,表未被正常处理干净,遗留在回收站中.
查询mos确认是Bug 20114306 – Objects left in recyclebin after upgrade to 12.1.0.2 or with fix for bug 16851194 present – superseded (文档 ID 20114306.8)
可以尝试打上补丁21498770或者23100700然后设置_fix_control
alter system set "_fix_control"='16851194:off' ;
确认该_fix_control是否可以设置,可以查询 v$system_fix_control视图
DBMS_STATS收集子分区表导致library cache lock等待
有客户反馈一个问题,业务中有一张表无论是查询还是dml操作都非常慢,让我们介入分析
数据库版本
打上了170814比较新的psu
[oracle@xffdb1 ~]$ $ORACLE_HOME/OPatch/opatch lsinventory Oracle 中间补丁程序安装程序版本 11.2.0.3.15 版权所有 (c) 2018, Oracle Corporation。保留所有权利。 Oracle Home : /u01/app/oracle/product/11.2.0/db_1 Central Inventory : /u01/app/oraInventory from : /u01/app/oracle/product/11.2.0/db_1/oraInst.loc OPatch version : 11.2.0.3.15 OUI version : 11.2.0.4.0 Log file location : /u01/app/oracle/product/11.2.0/db_1/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2018-01-06_16-20-22下午_1.log -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Local Machine Information:: Hostname: xffdb1 ARU platform id: 226 ARU platform description:: Linux x86-64 已安装的顶级产品 (1): Oracle Database 11g 11.2.0.4.0 此 Oracle 主目录中已安装 1 个产品。 中间补丁程序 (2) : Patch 26609929 : applied on Fri Sep 15 14:28:51 CST 2017 Unique Patch ID: 21482966 Patch description: "OCW Patch Set Update : 11.2.0.4.170814 (26609929)" Patch 26609445 : applied on Fri Sep 15 14:28:04 CST 2017 Unique Patch ID: 21482382 Patch description: "Database Patch Set Update : 11.2.0.4.170814 (26609445)"
这里显示大量的library cache lock等待
做systemstate分析
Resource Holder State LOCK: Handle=0x325d938e08 74: 74: is waiting for PIN: Handle=0x325d938e08 Enq TX-00E0001B-000004D3 488: 488: is waiting for 74: Mutex 1e7fbf6c 322: 322: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-02850009-00000086 630: 630: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-02BC000A-0000009E ??? Blocker Enq TX-0075000E-000010BE ??? Blocker PIN: Handle=0x325d938e08 ??? Blocker Enq TX-049A000C-00000002 ??? Blocker Enq TX-034C001D-00000038 ??? Blocker Enq TX-052C0012-00000002 669: 669: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-04620004-00000003 ??? Blocker Enq TX-009B0020-00000DA6 ??? Blocker Mutex af4db5a8 242: 242: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-041E0002-00000005 ??? Blocker Mutex 663b253d 727: 727: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-04FA0008-00000003 124: 124: is waiting for 69: Enq TX-031D0010-0000005B ??? Blocker Enq TX-02BB0004-000000A2 ??? Blocker Enq TX-0248001A-000000CD 69: 69: is waiting for Enq TX-02BC000A-0000009E Enq TX-03D70008-00000002 ??? Blocker Enq TX-02B1001D-00000081 ??? Blocker Enq TX-0423001A-00000003 ??? Blocker Enq TX-051A0007-00000003 506: 506: is waiting for 74: Mutex 2aceb8e9 602: 602: is waiting for 74: Mutex c6b2e0f4 196: 196: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-00A30020-0000055A ??? Blocker Enq TX-00D70015-00000315 ??? Blocker Enq TX-03B30006-00000012 ??? Blocker Enq TX-008C0003-00001005 ??? Blocker Enq TX-05470014-00000006 219: 219: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-054E0018-00000006 673: 673: is waiting for 74: Mutex f28c06f8 279: 279: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-03D30012-00000002 ??? Blocker Enq TX-055C001B-00000005 333: 333: is waiting for Enq TX-01CF000B-00000B2F Mutex 2ff03da9 276: 276: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-030A000A-000000B6 ??? Blocker Enq TX-00530004-000023DF 212: 212: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-05550017-00000002 469: 469: is waiting for 74: Mutex 724ba5e3 177: 177: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-03C10007-00000015 ??? Blocker Enq TX-02E30006-00000079 ??? Blocker IPC 6 6 Blocker Enq TX-0289000B-0000005F 449: 449: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-021E0002-000001DA ??? Blocker Mutex a9fcc7b8 131: 131: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-0483001F-00000009 ??? Blocker Enq TX-00800010-00000BA0 ??? Blocker Mutex c0af249e 666: 666: is waiting for 74: Mutex 94389ed4 78: 78: is waiting for 74: Mutex 4ac40611 143: 143: is waiting for 74: Mutex 24c1c387 168: 168: is waiting for 74: Mutex 930636c9 752: 752: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-04660001-00000003 ??? Blocker Enq TX-01B6000A-00000022 ??? Blocker Enq TX-0166000F-000002C7 ??? Blocker Enq TX-02FF0008-000000A1 ??? Blocker Enq TX-01E10001-00000023 ??? Blocker Enq TX-0327000E-0000009E ??? Blocker Enq TX-05120016-00000002 615: 615: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-039F001D-00000011 ??? Blocker Enq TX-01CF000B-00000B2F ??? Blocker Enq TX-01130020-000001B6 ??? Blocker Enq TX-052A0021-00000002 635: 635: is waiting for 74: Mutex ebf68fee 579: 579: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-02350017-000000D6 ??? Blocker Enq TX-00BB0000-00000598 ??? Blocker Enq TX-0443000E-00000003 ??? Blocker Mutex e7bae014 344: 344: is waiting for 74: Mutex fe251793 616: 616: is waiting for 74: Mutex 750494ae 180: 180: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-01230010-000001C0 ??? Blocker Enq TX-0543001C-00000003 119: 119: is waiting for 124: Enq TX-04E60014-00000005 ??? Blocker Enq TX-00F1000A-000002AB ??? Blocker Mutex aa83fbd7 651: 651: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-058A0002-00000003 ??? Blocker Enq TX-03B00016-0000000F ??? Blocker Mutex 26e065a4 150: 150: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-0219001B-000001BE ??? Blocker Enq TX-00B9001D-00000069 ??? Blocker Enq TX-01110020-00000198 ??? Blocker Enq TX-04F3001B-00000002 ??? Blocker Enq TX-04A60015-00000002 ??? Blocker Enq TX-02D30015-0000008A ??? Blocker Enq TX-01540018-000001B7 ??? Blocker Enq TX-02240019-0000001C ??? Blocker Mutex e595002d 502: 502: is waiting for 74: Mutex 1661a4cb 732: 732: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-00320010-00003A12 ??? Blocker Enq TX-020F001F-00000027 ??? Blocker Enq TX-0387000A-0000004D 515: 515: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-01260014-0000012D ??? Blocker Enq TX-02EE001D-0000005F ??? Blocker Enq TX-004A0001-00000882 603: 603: is waiting for Enq TX-02240019-0000001C Mutex 4a18a781 258: 258: is waiting for 74: LOCK: Handle=0x325aa4c428 643: 643: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-037A0002-0000006E 118: 118: is waiting for 74: Enq TX-02460020-0000006D 493: 493: is waiting for Enq TX-00F1000A-000002AB PROCESS 74: J000 ---------------------------------------- SO: 0x31a2b2e440, type: 2, owner: (nil), flag: INIT/-/-/0x00 if: 0x3 c: 0x3 proc=0x31a2b2e440, name=process, file=ksu.h LINE:12721, pg=0 (process) Oracle pid:74, ser:153, calls cur/top: 0x305d24c378/0x305f3f5eb0 flags : (0x0) - flags2: (0x10), flags3: (0x10) intr error: 0, call error: 0, sess error: 0, txn error 0 intr queue: empty ksudlp FALSE at location: 0 (post info) last post received: 0 0 80 last post received-location: kji.h LINE:3691 ID:kjata: wake up enqueue owner last process to post me: 0x3182a6fca0 1 6 last post sent: 0 0 26 last post sent-location: ksa2.h LINE:285 ID:ksasnd last process posted by me: 0x3182a75038 2 6 (latch info) wait_event=0 bits=0x0 Process Group: DEFAULT, pseudo proc: 0x3162ddbe90 O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 103036 OSD pid info: Unix process pid: 103036, image: oracle@xffdb1 (J000) Short stack dump: ksedsts()+465<-ksdxfstk()+32<-ksdxcb()+1927<-sspuser()+112<-__sighandler()<-semtimedop()+10 <-skgpwwait()+178<-ksliwat()+2046<-kslwaitctx()+163<-kjusuc()+3400 <-ksipgetctxi()+1759<-kqlmPin()+2943<-kqlmClusterLock()+237<-kglpnal()+4072 <-kglpin()+1381<-qostobkglcrt1()+640<-qostobkglcrt()+255<-qospsts()+1639 <-spefcmpa()+196<-spefmccallstd()+235<-pextproc()+41<-peftrusted()+150 <-psdexsp()+255<-rpiswu2()+1776<-psdextp()+700<-pefccal()+726<-pefcal()+224 <-pevm_FCAL()+169<-pfrinstr_FCAL()+75<-pfrrun_no_tool()+63<-pfrrun()+627 <-plsql_run()+649<-peidxr_run()+263<-peidxexe()+79<-kkxdexe()+338 <-kkxmpexe()+241<-kgmexwi()+605<-kgmexec()+2193<-evapls()+813 <-evaopn2()+808<-kkxmexcs()+133<-opiexe()+20880<-kpoal8()+2380 <-opiodr()+917<-kpoodr()+1401<-upirtrc()+2436<-kpurcsc()+98 <-kpuexec()+10790<-OCIStmtExecute()+39<-jslvec_execcb1()+672 <-jslvswu()+56<-jslve_execute0()+2257<-jslve_execute()+332 <-rpiswu2()+1776<-kkjex1e()+379<-kkjsexe()+711<-kkjrdp()+694 <-opirip()+958<-opidrv()+603<-sou2o()+103<-opimai_real()+250 <-ssthrdmain()+265<-main()+201<-__libc_start_main()+253 SO: 0x31c382f010, type: 4, owner: 0x31a2b2e440, flag: INIT/-/-/0x00 if: 0x3 c: 0x3 proc=0x31a2b2e440, name=session, file=ksu.h LINE:12729, pg=0 (session) sid: 6001 ser: 679 trans: 0x311e36fa28, creator: 0x31a2b2e440 flags: (0x8010041) USR/- flags_idl: (0x1) BSY/-/-/-/-/- flags2: (0x40009) -/-/INC DID: , short-term DID: txn branch: (nil) edition#: 100 oct: 170, prv: 0, sql: 0x323de178e8, psql: 0x32b5d0fc98, user: 0/SYS ksuxds FALSE at location: 0 service name: SYS$USERS client details: O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 103036 machine: xffdb1 program: oracle@xffdb1 (J000) application name: DBMS_SCHEDULER, hash value=2478762354 action name: ORA$AT_OS_OPT_SY_1594, hash value=1524069073 Current Wait Stack: 0: waiting for 'library cache pin' handle address=0x325d938e08, pin address=0x325baec3e0, 100*mode+namespace=0x850fe00010003 wait_id=46488 seq_num=46502 snap_id=1 wait times: snap=6 min 2 sec, exc=6 min 2 sec, total=6 min 2 sec wait times: max=15 min 0 sec, heur=6 min 2 sec wait counts: calls=727 os=727 in_wait=1 iflags=0x15a2 There are 2136 sessions blocked by this session.
发现主要是74号进程阻塞了其他的
做hanganalyze分析
------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chain 1: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Oracle session identified by: { instance: 1 (xffdb.xffdbsv1) os id: 82310 process id: 224, oracle@xffdb1 session id: 4 session serial #: 12237 } is waiting for 'enq: TX - row lock contention' with wait info: { p1: 'name|mode'=0x54580006 p2: 'usn<<16 | slot'=0x21e0002 p3: 'sequence'=0x1da time in wait: 3 min 48 sec timeout after: never wait id: 1260 blocking: 0 sessions current sql: UPDATE t_xifenfei subpartition(p201801_s32) SET INDICATORCODE = :1, LOWERLIMIT = :2, UPPERLIMIT = :3, AVGUNITPRICE = :4, TRADEITEMNAME = :5, short stack: ……………… wait history: * time between current wait and wait #1: 0.000220 sec 1. event: 'gc cr block 2-way' time waited: 0.000341 sec wait id: 1259 p1: ''=0x6 p2: ''=0x3590 p3: ''=0x44b * time between wait #1 and #2: 0.000284 sec 2. event: 'gc current block 3-way' time waited: 0.000663 sec wait id: 1258 p1: ''=0xa p2: ''=0x3ad02 p3: ''=0x2000001 * time between wait #2 and #3: 0.000383 sec 3. event: 'gc cr block 2-way' time waited: 0.000288 sec wait id: 1257 p1: ''=0x5 p2: ''=0x2e20 p3: ''=0x957 } and is blocked by => Oracle session identified by: { instance: 3 (xffdb.xffdbsv3) os id: 39472 process id: 587, oracle@xffdb3 session id: 2215 session serial #: 8213 } which is waiting for 'library cache lock' with wait info: { p1: 'handle address'=0x327f5ecea0 p2: 'lock address'=0x327a5ab660 p3: '100*mode+namespace'=0x850fe00010002 time in wait: 3 min 43 sec timeout after: 11 min 16 sec wait id: 2343 blocking: 3 sessions current sql: SELECT COUNT(*) COUNT FROM t_xifenfei subpartition(p201801_s32) WHERE TRADEITEMID = '679EA6DE428F414D014B3D5EC8DE5E32' short stack: ……………… wait history: * time between current wait and wait #1: 0.000908 sec 1. event: 'SQL*Net message from client' time waited: 0.001074 sec wait id: 2342 p1: 'driver id'=0x54435000 p2: '#bytes'=0x1 * time between wait #1 and #2: 0.000033 sec 2. event: 'SQL*Net message to client' time waited: 0.000003 sec wait id: 2341 p1: 'driver id'=0x54435000 p2: '#bytes'=0x1 * time between wait #2 and #3: 0.000069 sec 3. event: 'SQL*Net message from client' time waited: 0.001232 sec wait id: 2340 p1: 'driver id'=0x54435000 p2: '#bytes'=0x1 } and is blocked by => Oracle session identified by: { instance: 1 (xffdb.xffdbsv1) os id: 103036 process id: 74, oracle@xffdb1 (J000) session id: 6001 session serial #: 679 } which is waiting for 'library cache pin' with wait info: { p1: 'handle address'=0x325d938e08 p2: 'pin address'=0x325baec3e0 p3: '100*mode+namespace'=0x850fe00010003 time in wait: 3 min 47 sec timeout after: 11 min 12 sec wait id: 46488 blocking: 2099 sessions current sql: call dbms_stats.gather_database_stats_job_proc ( ) short stack: ………… wait history: * time between current wait and wait #1: 0.000038 sec 1. event: 'library cache lock' time waited: 0.012353 sec wait id: 46487 p1: 'handle address'=0x325d938e08 p2: 'lock address'=0x3259aee680 p3: '100*mode+namespace'=0x850fe00010003 * time between wait #1 and #2: 0.002509 sec 2. event: 'enq: IV - contention' time waited: 0.001079 sec wait id: 46486 p1: 'type|mode'=0x49560005 p2: 'id1'=0x53594e43 p3: 'id2'=0x15 * time between wait #2 and #3: 0.000085 sec 3. event: 'enq: IV - contention' time waited: 0.001817 sec wait id: 46485 p1: 'type|mode'=0x49560005 p2: 'id1'=0x4c4f434b p3: 'id2'=0x15 } Chain 1 Signature: 'library cache pin'<='library cache lock'<='enq: TX - row lock contention' Chain 1 Signature Hash: 0xa08ff7bf
到这里基本上可以确定是由于自动任务收集统计信息导致系统出现大量的library cache lock和library cache pin,另外可以确定大部分被阻塞在library cache 相关的select和dml语句都集中在t_xifenfei这个子分区表中,通过查询mos,发现相关bug:Bug 19790972 – “library cache lock” waits due to DBMS_STATS gather of stats for a subpartition
insert into aud$引起高版本问题导致ORA-600[17059]
昨天晚上有朋友咨询我,他数据库(win2008 11.2.0.1 单机)出现大量ORA-00600[17059],如下错误,让帮忙分析原因
alert日志报错
Sat Mar 19 21:31:02 2016 Errors in file d:\app\administrator\diag\rdbms\orcl\orcl\trace\orcl_ora_3336.trc (incident=45304): ORA-00600: 内部错误代码, 参数: [17059], [0x49BE74CB0], [0x49BE75548], [0x4A9A0FFD0], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [] ORA-28001: 口令已经失效 Sat Mar 19 21:31:06 2016 Errors in file d:\app\administrator\diag\rdbms\orcl\orcl\trace\orcl_ora_4168.trc (incident=45166): ORA-00600: 内部错误代码, 参数: [17059], [0x49BE74CB0], [0x49BE75548], [0x4A9A0FFD0], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [] Sat Mar 19 21:31:09 2016 Errors in file d:\app\administrator\diag\rdbms\orcl\orcl\trace\orcl_ora_2928.trc (incident=45342): ORA-00600: 内部错误代码, 参数: [17059], [0x49BE74CB0], [0x49BE75548], [0x4A9A0FFD0], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [] Sat Mar 19 21:31:12 2016 Errors in file d:\app\administrator\diag\rdbms\orcl\orcl\trace\orcl_ora_5812.trc (incident=45399): ORA-00600: 内部错误代码, 参数: [17059], [0x49BE74CB0], [0x49BE75548], [0x4A9A0FFD0], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [] ORA-28001: 口令已经失效 Sat Mar 19 21:31:17 2016 Errors in file d:\app\administrator\diag\rdbms\orcl\orcl\trace\orcl_ora_5884.trc (incident=45255): ORA-00600: 内部错误代码, 参数: [17059], [0x49BE74CB0], [0x49BE75548], [0x4A9A0FFD0], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [] ORA-28001: 口令已经失效 Sat Mar 19 21:31:21 2016 Errors in file d:\app\administrator\diag\rdbms\orcl\orcl\trace\orcl_ora_2976.trc (incident=45305): ORA-00600: 内部错误代码, 参数: [17059], [0x49BE74CB0], [0x49BE75548], [0x4A9A0FFD0], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [] ORA-28001: 口令已经失效 Sat Mar 19 21:31:24 2016 Errors in file d:\app\administrator\diag\rdbms\orcl\orcl\trace\orcl_ora_6068.trc (incident=45256): ORA-00600: 内部错误代码, 参数: [17059], [0x49BE74CB0], [0x49BE75548], [0x4A9A0FFD0], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [] ORA-28001: 口令已经失效 Sat Mar 19 21:31:28 2016 Errors in file d:\app\administrator\diag\rdbms\orcl\orcl\trace\orcl_ora_6044.trc (incident=45351): ORA-00600: 内部错误代码, 参数: [17059], [0x49BE74CB0], [0x49BE75548], [0x4A9A0FFD0], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [] ORA-28001: 口令已经失效 Sat Mar 19 21:31:32 2016 Errors in file d:\app\administrator\diag\rdbms\orcl\orcl\trace\orcl_ora_2928.trc (incident=45343): ORA-00600: 内部错误代码, 参数: [17059], [0x49BE74CB0], [0x49BE75548], [0x4A9A0FFD0], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [] ORA-02002: 写入审计线索时出错
这里虽然报了ORA-00600[17059],ORA-28001,ORA-02002但是根据经验感觉很可能是由于ORA-00600[17059]错误导致后面的其他两个错误.
trace文件信息
Dump continued from file: d:\app\administrator\diag\rdbms\orcl\orcl\trace\orcl_ora_5484.trc ORA-00600: 内部错误代码, 参数: [17059], [0x49BE74CB0], [0x49BE75548], [0x4A9A0FFD0], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [] ========= Dump for incident 45253 (ORA 600 [17059]) ======== *** 2016-03-19 21:28:34.244 dbkedDefDump(): Starting incident default dumps (flags=0x2, level=3, mask=0x0) ----- Current SQL Statement for this session (sql_id=4vs91dcv7u1p6) ----- insert into sys.aud$( sessionid,entryid,statement,ntimestamp#, userid,userhost,terminal,action#,returncode, obj$creator,obj$name,auth$privileges,auth$grantee, new$owner,new$name,ses$actions,ses$tid,logoff$pread, logoff$lwrite,logoff$dead,comment$text,spare1,spare2, priv$used,clientid,sessioncpu,proxy$sid,user$guid, instance#,process#,xid,scn,auditid, sqlbind,sqltext,obj$edition,dbid) values(:1,:2,:3,SYS_EXTRACT_UTC(SYSTIMESTAMP), :4,:5,:6,:7,:8, :9,:10,:11,:12, :13,:14,:15,:16,:17, :18,:19,:20,:21,:22, :23,:24,:25,:26,:27, :28,:29,:30,:31,:32, :33,:34,:35,:36) ----- Call Stack Trace ----- calling call entry argument values in hex location type point (? means dubious value) -------------------- -------- -------------------- ---------------------------- ksedst1()+129 CALL??? skdstdst() 009173DA2 000000000 000000000 000000000 ksedst()+69 CALL??? ksedst1() 000000002 000000000 006F605E0 000000000 dbkedDefDump()+4536 CALL??? ksedst() 000000287 000000000 000000000 000000000 ksedmp()+43 CALL??? dbkedDefDump() 000000003 000000002 000000000 000468E71 ksfdmp()+87 CALL??? ksedmp() 000000000 000000000 000000000 000000000 dbgexPhaseII()+1819 CALL??? ksfdmp() 000000000 000000000 000000000 000000000 dbgexProcessError() CALL??? dbgexPhaseII() 021160570 02116D448 00000B0C5 +2563 000000002 dbgeExecuteForError CALL??? dbgexProcessError() 021160570 021167540 000000001 ()+65 000000000 dbgePostErrorKGE()+ CALL??? dbgeExecuteForError 025455460 00000000C 000000001 1726 () 4A9A0FFD0 dbkePostKGE_kgsf()+ CALL??? dbgePostErrorKGE() 025455460 024690040 000000258 75 7F883243A05D kgeade()+560 CALL??? dbkePostKGE_kgsf() 000000001 000000000 00A684E58 00A5553E2 kgeriv_int()+111 CALL??? kgeade() 024444C49 000000000 000000000 000000000 kgeriv()+29 CALL??? kgeriv_int() 000000000 000000001 02B474DD0 000000001 kgesiv()+105 CALL??? kgeriv() 461A8AD00 7F883243A05D 025455460 000000001 kgesic3()+60 CALL??? kgesiv() 401122000 000000000 009B4310C 4A9A0EC80 kgltba()+739 CALL??? kgesic3() 000000200 6236313231656434 4000042A3 000000002 kglhdgc()+384 CALL??? kgltba() 4A095BC50 461A31858 02B476418 000000001 kglLock()+3063 CALL??? kglhdgc() 000000000 000020C68 4ADE08E18 000000008 kglget()+403 CALL??? kglLock() 02B476008 02B475360 02B475360 0004D112F kxsGetLookupLock()+ CALL??? kglget() 025455460 02B4756A0 000000001 327 000000003 kksfbc()+14464 CALL??? kxsGetLookupLock() 4AC4EDFB0 0004FD4CA 0246CC6B8 4AC4EDFB0 kkspsc0()+2117 CALL??? kksfbc() 0246CC6B8 000000003 000000008 0070D7F80 kksParseCursor()+18 CALL??? kkspsc0() 0246B19B8 0070D7F80 000000256 1 000000003 opiosq0()+2538 CALL??? kksParseCursor() 000000000 025454EA0 000000000 0033917DF opiosq()+23 CALL??? opiosq0() 000000003 00000000F 02B478A28 025450000 opiodr()+1662 CALL??? opiosq() 0746E6172 000000002 06567656C 000000000 rpidrus()+862 CALL??? opiodr() 00000004A 00000000F 02B478A28 000000001 rpidru()+154 CALL??? rpidrus() 02B478028 000000001 000000000 000400000 rpiswu2()+2757 CALL??? rpidru() 02B4788B0 000000000 1D181E32DAE2234 000000000 rpidrv()+6105 CALL??? rpiswu2() 4AC4EC300 000000000 02B478680 000000002 rpisplu()+1607 CALL??? rpidrv() 400000001 7F880000004A 02B478A28 000000008 audins()+2562 CALL??? rpisplu() 000000001 000000000 000000000 000000000 audlon()+1286 CALL??? audins() 000005028 0070D9274 0070D9280 000000036 auddft()+2140 CALL??? audlon() 006F79DE0 0092ACAF1 000000000 000000000 kpolnb()+4007 CALL??? auddft() 0246AF458 000000064 000000000 000000000 kpolon()+237 CALL??? kpolnb() 1D181E300000051 02B47AF20 000000000 000026161 opiodr()+1662 CALL??? kpolon() 000000001 000000000 000000000 00A42F224 ttcpip()+1325 CALL??? opiodr() 4800000000000051 40000001A 02B47E100 000000000 opitsk()+2040 CALL??? ttcpip() 02546F180 000000000 000000000 000000000 opiino()+1258 CALL??? opitsk() 000000000 000000000 000000000 02B47F9F8 opiodr()+1662 CALL??? opiino() 00000003C 000000004 02B47FAB0 000000000 opidrv()+864 CALL??? opiodr() 00000003C 000000004 02B47FAB0 615C3A6400000000 sou2o()+98 CALL??? opidrv()+150 00000003C 000000004 02B47FAB0 000000000 opimai_real()+158 CALL??? sou2o() 1D181E32DAE2234 000000000 150013000307E0 601B80009001C opimai()+191 CALL??? opimai_real() 000000000 02B47FC68 01D3200A0 02B47FC68 OracleThreadStart() CALL??? opimai() 000000000 006DF0B34 0000000E0 +724 0000027CC 0000000076E1652D CALL??? OracleThreadStart() 02957FF18 000000000 000000000 000000000 0000000076F4C521 CALL??? 0000000076E16520 000000000 000000000 000000000 000000000 --------------------- Binary Stack Dump --------------------- LibraryObject: Address=9be74cb0 HeapMask=0000-0001-0001 Flags=EXS[0000] Flags2=[0000] PublicFlags=[0000] ChildTable: size='32768' Child: id='0' Table=9be75b60 Reference=9be75600 Handle=a9a0eb20 Child: id='1' Table=9be75b60 Reference=9be61ed8 Handle=a9a06700 Child: id='2' Table=9be75b60 Reference=9be621f0 Handle=a9a06500 Child: id='3' Table=9be75b60 Reference=9be62528 Handle=a9997200 Child: id='4' Table=9be75b60 Reference=9be62818 Handle=a99597a8 Child: id='5' Table=9be75b60 Reference=9be62b50 Handle=a99cd210 Child: id='6' Table=9be75b60 Reference=9bd0a418 Handle=a994a308 Child: id='7' Table=9be75b60 Reference=9bd0a750 Handle=a9920980 Child: id='8' Table=9be75b60 Reference=9bd0aa40 Handle=a99a6d48 Child: id='9' Table=9be75b60 Reference=9bd0ad78 Handle=a99a6918 Child: id='10' Table=9be75b60 Reference=9bd0b068 Handle=a9993388 ………… Child: id='32764' Table=becbd118 Reference=bec882d8 Handle=522c1118 Child: id='32765' Table=becbd118 Reference=bec7c708 Handle=52319608 Child: id='32766' Table=becbd118 Reference=bec7c9f8 Handle=522c0f18 Child: id='32767' Table=becbd118 Reference=bec7cd30 Handle=522a7858
结合trace信息,我们可以发现高版本数量已经到了32768,理论最大值.因此数据库报了ORA-600[17059]错误(以前写过类似文章:因为高版本引起ORA-00600[17059]),并且引起了其他的ORA-错误.通过查询数据库高版本信息,在重启一会儿的库中,发现
过几分钟后
通过这里,进一步诊断,引起高版本的sql,是由于aud$表相关的插入时绑定参数导致(如果需要可以进一步分析是由于什么原因导致了高版本).这里根据经验具体原因已经不再重要,对于11.2.0.1版本,本身bug比较多,且暂时无法升级
处理方法
1.因为本库的本地审计意义不大直接从数据库层面关闭
audit_trail='none'
2.在11g的初始版本中,acs特性导致子游标过多,建议关闭
_optimizer_adaptive_cursor_sharing=false _optimizer_extended_cursor_sharing=none _optimizer_extended_cursor_sharing_rel=none
3.限制数据库sql游标数量,当游标超过该数量直接抛弃重新硬解析
_cursor_features_enabled=34 event='106001 trace name context forever,level 100'
通过以上配置,重启数据库之后,运行一天alert日志未再出现任何错误,通过查询mos匹配Bug 10196339 : ORA600[17059] OCCURS DUE TO BIND_MISMATCH